Why Are We Trusting Iran?

This week, NBC reporter, Ann Curry, interviewed Iran’s Foreign Minister, Javid Zarif. In the interview, Zarif claims that Iran is very close to a nuke deal. He also states that the Netanyahu regime should be annihilated. He goes on to add that Iran does not want to kill Jews. “After all,” he reminds us. “There are Jews in Iran.” But upon further questioning, Zarif clarifies that he just wants to annihilate the State of Israel (which, by the way, is the world’s largest concentration of Jews).

Here is a section of Ann Curry’s exchange with Javid Zarif:

ANN CURRY: So how does Iran want to annihilate the regime of Israel, since you’re making the difference?

JAVAD ZARIF: We don’t want to annihilate. We don’t want to–

ANN CURRY: Well, the Supreme Leader–

JAVAD ZARIF: –annihilate anybody.

ANN CURRY: –tweeted that–

JAVAD ZARIF: We have– the– well, what he says–

ANN CURRY: –it should be annihilated.

JAVAD ZARIF: It– it should be annihilated. That this regime is a threat, is a threat…

In typical Obama-esque spin technique, Iran is spinning their verbiage to reflect that Benjamin Netanyahu is the biggest threat to peace – not Iran.

Why are we negotiating with these people? We should be posing stiff sanctions and insisting on a complete eradication of their nuclear program, as they clearly cannot be trusted.

Sources:

1.       Pollak, J. (3/5/15). Iran Renews Vow to ‘Annihilate’ Israel, NBC Buries Lede. Breitbart, Retrieved March 5, 2015, from http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/03/05/iran-renews-vow-to-annihilate-israel-nbc-buries-lede/

2.       Schuppe, J. (3/5/15). Iran Foreign Minister: We Believe We Are ‘Very Close’ to Nuke Deal. NBC News. Retrieved March 5, 2015 from http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/iran-foreign-minister-we-believe-we-are-very-close-nuke-n317356

3.       (3/5/15). Full Interview With Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javid Zarif. NBC News. Retrieved March 5, 2015, from http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/full-interview-iranian-foreign-minister-mohammad-javad-zarif-n317516

Netanyahu’s Warning

It is a sad state of affairs when our biggest ally must come to the our country to defend itself from our actions that could potentially bring about its complete destruction. This is precisely what Bibi Netanyahu did this morning.

In his address to the joint session of Congress this morning he warned of two major concessions that the U.S. is proposing in its nuclear deal with Iran:

1.       It would not destroy any of Iran’s nuclear facilities, thus leaving in place a vast nuclear infrastructure. Some centrifuges would be allowed to continue running, while others were simply disconnected; and

2.      All of the restrictions would automatically expire in around 10 years.

If Iran is allowed to prevail in its ability to enrich uranium, we will be looking at another arms race and the potential destruction of Israel.

What is Wrong With President Obama?

What is wrong with our President? He refuses to use the word “Christian.” He refuses to call Islamic terrorism by its name. He gives the cold shoulder to our biggest ally, Israel, and has gone even so far as to refuse to listen to Bibi Netanyahu’s upcoming address to Congress on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Old Joe won’t be at that joint session of Congress, either, not that it really matters.

Obama has refused to assist in arming Jordan -- another U.S. ally, I might add – with ISIS at its doorstep. Neither will he help Egypt. It seems that President Obama  is a little sore over al-Sissi’s defeat of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt during the Arab Spring. Doesn’t he realize that the Muslim Brotherhood is the terrorist organization that spawned Hamas – another terrorist organization?  Obama also refused to give Jordan and Egypt intelligence on ISIS targets in Syria and Libya.

Quoting the Times of Israel:

 “Ryan Mauro, National Security Analyst for the Clarion Project, wonders why the world agrees that ISIS is morally repugnant even as Hamas gets a pass. ‘Both implement sharia governance, deliberately target civilians, have genocidal beliefs and seek the establishment of a caliphate,’ He further explains that ISIS’s determination to exterminate Iraq’s Yazidi population is “no more egregious” than Hamas’s determination to eliminate millions of Jews. And the only difference between the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and ISIS is in regard to their method of achieving the same goal. The Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas wish to establish a Muslim caliphate incrementally, while ISIS is willing to do anything and everything to bring one about as quickly as possible. “

President Obama recently met with 15 Muslim leaders, many of whom are in groups spawned by the Muslim Brotherhood.  The Muslim Brotherhood is not a benign organization. It is, rather, an existential threat to American values and the American way of life.

President Obama offers the usual “Obama Speak” on being part of a “coalition” to defeat ISIS. If he really believes it, then why is he refusing to help our allies?

*Sources:

http://politix.topix.com/story/u44249-obama-refused-to-give-jordan-egypt-intelligence-information-on-isis-targets-youtube

http://madworldnews.com/jordan-egypt-help-isis/

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/arnold-ahlert/the-muslim-brotherhood-isis-connection/

*I use these sources because the lame stream media refuses to report on anything that I have written about. What does that say about the major media outlets?